@diegosings_ @NASA There is a lot of active cancer research going on at the U.S. National Laboratory on the ISS. They are using the zero G environment to develop new techniques for more effective drug treatments as well. So in effect NASA is supplementing cancer research.

@cubfan135 @NASA Yeah that makes sense. Create something in zero G that will be used in a density based environment.. Where do you all come up with this Masonic trash? Answer me this smart guy, why was there no rocket dispersion crater with any of the supposed moon landings? One of many questions

@Eaglized @NASA Whether you are in zero G or not matter and materials still have mass and density. So literally everywhere is a 'density based environment'. That's an easy concept to become confused on if you're unfamiliar with what density means though. (1/2)

@cubfan135 @NASA You missed the underlined point there. Gravity is still a theory that can't be proven. Density on the other hand, can. You're also wrong, something created in a low density environment will change when introduced into, say, a sea level environment.

@Eaglized @NASA The Lunar Module rockets didn't leave craters because they touched down with near zero velocity. That's what the rocket part was for! The apollo stages which were intentionally crashed into the moon actually did leave craters which were recorded with seismometerson the moon!(2/2)

@cubfan135 @NASA Hahaha! Near zero velocity.. What I see is zero intelligence in whoever came up with that excuse. Take a look at the footage of the supposed landing, watch the dust fly, then tell me everything matches up. Funny too that a voice could be heard while sitting on top of a rocket.