Most women, narcissistic men + low T men have low truth preference. Narcissistic men are fine with general truths, but don't like hearing unflattering personal truths - same as women, except they also reject general truths unvalidated by the majority (high conformity preference)

Truth isn't as important to women as it is men. They value comfort and reputation more, so often lie to themselves to avoid feeling bad or low. Truth seeking's more of a masculine/intellectual value. Women's high value is conformity - which is why they socially police everyone.

Women just want everyone to get along by lying to one another and avoiding direct conflicts, whilst also feeling special and included so they can bask in feeling *ultimately safe* - which other than babies, is the unending quest of the female psyche - to be desired WHILST safe.

That's why if you throw women into any equation, discourse devolves into trite like "you can't say that, that's mean!" and "stop being so insensitive!" - they have all these derailing objections focused on conflict avoidance because they value truth less than conformity + safety.

Unless you trigger them, then they try to shame + ostracise you, because the things they most fear happening to them are their preferred tools for harming others. Getting them to focus on a subject matter without derailing it with tone policing or personal attacks is a challenge.

This is why I think including women in higher education is a subversive act against the academy itself, and changes its very nature. Higher education is meant to brutal and conflict oriented. A literal battleground of ideas. Not a safe space for fragile + egoistic sensibilities.

You need a culture of conflict to sharpen minds + imbue courage, iron constantly sharpening iron, with truth rather than safety held as the apex value We hang up our axes and pikes and resort to intellectual ripostes. That's how it's *meant to be* Women's presence destroys this

For that reason alone I don't believe men and women should be educated together. If women want their higher education, so be it, but it should be away from the men, lest the men lose the culture of conflict so important to refining their intellects and developing their backbones.

Of course, we all know one of the predominant reasons women enter higher education is specifically for the purpose of having access to high IQ men with good earning potential. So women don't care about this. Their incentives are diametric, hence they'll foist themselves on us.

Women always want to maximise their access to high value men. And women who truly value education and who possess more masculine qualities would see the male institutions are superior, and then complain about not being allowed in as the female one would comparatively suck.

In mixed settings, women tend to outperform men due to institutional bias and because the presence of women feminises the culture. But if you had single sex institutions competing, I wager the men's would win, as the natural culture of their sex would be given room to flourish.

In this sense, a man's culture is more fragile, because men being the more reasonable sex are more likely to make concessions and defer to the sentiments of women, who are more easily upset and prone to hold everyone hostage with hysterics Women make no such concessions for men.

By being less neurotic (yet more conflict seeking, reasonable and truth seeking) men find themselves in this strange position of having a culture less resilient to the imposition of the opposite sex, yet better capable of creating higher and more rigorous intellectual output.

I call this tyranny by hysteria. Group female neuroticism demands greater appeasement than group male testosterone, and therefore more aggressively imposes itself. Neuroticism driven hysteria is a more powerful force of volition than testosterone. Crazy conquers everything.

Whilst there is an aggressive element to testosterone, there is also a rational element. Neuroticism lacks that rational element. Only contains the intolerant, aggressive element.

In the sense masculine culture's more fragile, I think u can liken it to entropy. It's hard to create, but easier to destroy/regulate Men are natural builders, women are natural regulators The feminine thus drains the masculine of vitality through constant neurotic regulation.

Be that as it may, for all the aforementioned reasons I maintain girls should not be educated alongside boys, assuming you deem the education of girls important enough to contemplate disrupting boy's. Truth + courage are the masculine's ultimate values and cannot be compromised.

Girls and women, simply put, will never value truth to the extent boys and men do. There will be some outliers, yes, but at the population level mixing is simply unfeasible. All you do is lower standards so women can feel included and important, and civilization pays the price.

A being that inherently values emotions above logic will never be a superior scholar or intellectual mind, nor care for truth as much as one more inherently reasonable + of a less delicate sensibility. This is glaringly obvious when stated, yet entirely overlooked by almost all.

Tyranny by hysteria reminds me of Taleb's concept of the intransigent minority. All you need is a subset of intolerant people who care a lot about something that the majority doesn't to change the rules for everyone. This entropy effect's seen whenever women enter institutions.

Essentially if you see a large number of women beginning to enter an institution, you can safely write off the future of that institution. To borrow a phrase from finance, you've hit the top + now you're entering a bear market until you reach collapse. Hedge against all the way.

The feminisation of everything is the deconstruction of everything in the pursuit of conformity. When truth is no longer the highest value and your connection to reality grows weak, only delusion + insanity remain, condemning us all. This is what we pay for giving them freedom.

What's the difference between between giving women freedom, and opening the gates of chaos? Precisely none. They are one and the same, just framed differently. Because when chaos triumphs over order and emotion overshadows reason, there can only be cataclysm and pain.

A society dominated by feminine values is a society doomed to fail, in much the same way an institution dominated by feminine values is an institution doomed to fail. Same applies to romantic relationships. Applies at all scales. They just don't care about the truth enough.

@TellYourSonThis

@TellYourSonThis This site is still free 👑

@TellYourSonThis What is truth? 99% of most peoples “truth” is opinion and concept. Not actual reality.

@TellYourSonThis @LankyObserver That's the truth..we all want or claim we need to hear the truth but given an option without knowing we always choose lies since they suit our needs and we comforted by them

@TellYourSonThis https://x.com/tellyoursonthis/...

@TellYourSonThis Top tier thread keep it up 👍🏾

@TellYourSonThis Truly top notch info as always IM.

@TellYourSonThis IM, You're too much.

@TellYourSonThis We should be paying for this Thanks IM

@TellYourSonThis @threadreaderapp unroll

@TellYourSonThis @rattibha

@TellYourSonThis Fascinating trend as usual👍