I really dont understand how someone can be a "Professor of Comparative Archaeology" by profession, and somehow be this fundamentally wrong on one of the most basic concepts in Archaeology and Genetics. What causes this? What the fuck are they Teaching people at Unis?
"Guys, im a Professor of Archaeology, so when i say the Indo-Europeans dont exist, i must be right!" No, you have simply demonstrated how completely braindead you are, and that you have spent a lifetime in a profession you do not comprehend even the basics of
Right wing Anthropology autists won. Why? Because you must be Right wing and have the proper Weltanschauung to comprehend Prehistory, and you must understand that Demic Diffusion, Tribalism, Genocide and Conquest are fundamental parts of humanity that have always existed
Leftists have tried to twist and turn all of these things from existing in Prehistory, meanwhile Archaeogenetics has Vindicated us and forced the Majority of Academia to bow down to these fundamental realities, although they still take every tiny opportunity to discredit it
@VVeltkrieger Definitely not a Professor of Comparative Linguistics, that’s for sure
@VVeltkrieger His assertion that English is a "hybrid of hybrids," presumably going back farther and farther ad infinitum like a stack of miscegenated turtles, is nearly beyond parody. One must imagine that Dr. Wengrow, if he believed in the myth of Adam, would assert that he was mixed-race.
@VVeltkrieger The same happens with palaeoanthropology and the evolution of the genus Homo. Academia is full of ideology and misunderstanding due to stupid personal cosmovision
@VVeltkrieger It's just another evidence how traumatizing the archaeogenetic results of the past decade were for certain archaeologists.