Published: April 8, 2025
5
77
367

What did the Greeks think about Ancient India? > Did they think India too righteous to invade anyone? > That it had no slaves? > And that caste made everything run smoothly? In the 2nd century CE, Arrian wrote Indica — a Greek account of India that claimed all this & more. 🧵

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

Arrian wasn’t your average Greek historian. Born in the 2nd century CE, centuries after Alexander the Great had already marched across the known world, Arrian took it upon himself to write Indica, a kind of historical travelogue.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler
Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

This travelogue was to be about India through the eyes of Alexander’s expedition. Now, Arrian didn’t personally visit India. But he did something nearly as valuable — he compiled the observations of those who did, especially Nearchus, one of Alexander the Great’s admirals.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

He also drew from earlier authors, including Eratosthenes and Megasthenes — whose own work, also called Indica, shaped Greek views of India for generations. Through their eyes, and through Arrian’s words, we get one of the earliest detailed Greco-Roman accounts of India.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler
Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

Indica begins with geography. Arrian marvels at the Indus and the Ganges, comparing them to the Danube and the Nile. Then come older stories — of Heracles and Dionysus, whom the Greeks believed had once conquered India before Alexander.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

He goes on to describe Indian society: its castes, customs, and hunting methods. He lists animals and oddities, then shifts into a detailed retelling of Nearchus’ naval journey from India to Babylon — complete with strange tribes, sea battles, and long stretches of coastline.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

Occasionally, he pauses to describe the people they encountered, like the fish-eating Ichthyophagi. And finally, he ends with Nearchus reuniting with Alexander and being honored for surviving the journey.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

Now, not everything in the Indica is spot-on. Some things are accurate, some are exaggerated & a few are just… strange. But it offers us a useful look at how the Greeks & Romans thought about India. It’s as much a mirror of their imagination as it is a record of Indian reality.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

Take Arrian’s very first impression about how Indians looked. He makes a pointed distinction between North & South Indians. That mix of observation and stereotyping tells us less about Indians and more about the reference points the Greeks were working with.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

For them, Ethiopians and Egyptians were the outer markers of the known world. India sat just beyond, so it was compared to what they already knew.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

This a passing comment, but it tells us something too. The Greeks saw Indians as different, but not necessarily inferior — just distinct, & sometimes admirable. He then makes a claim about slavery in ancient Indian society that in today’s world, would raise a LOT of eyebrows.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

India had no slavery at all. Arrian was genuinely stunned by this fact. He even compares Indians to the Spartans, who supposedly didn’t do slavery either — except they, um, did. They had helots, who were basically slaves with a slightly more poetic job description.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

But clearly, to a Roman observer — whose world ran on slaves — this was nothing short of astonishing. Arrian uses it to paint Indian society as unusually moral, even ideal. That theme of moral superiority pops up again & again in his writings.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

It’s a flattering picture that reveals more about Greek perceptions than Indian policy. Take this quote attached below for instance. The idea that a whole civilisation could be powerful, advanced, and not expansionist was, to them, remarkable.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

Other parts of Indica hint at Indian values. For example, let’s take funerals. The Greeks built statues and tombs to honour their ancestors. Meanwhile, Indians, Arrian writes, honoured the dead through song and virtue (which kinda slaps, ngl).

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

And of course, caste gets a mention. The number is a little more than the usual four we hear about, which leads to a lot of interesting implications. Either way, it shows that even 2,000 years ago, outsiders were trying to make sense of India’s social jigsaw puzzle.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

So what do we make of Indica? Not a guidebook to ancient India, certainly. But it is a guide to how India was seen by the Greeks and Romans — how it puzzled them, impressed them, and challenged their assumptions. That, in itself, makes it worth reading.

Image in tweet by Cultural Chronicler

We go even deeper on Roman & Greek perceptions of India in our free newsletter — do NOT miss the next email. 500+ people read it: culture, art and history. Go click the link and Subscribe NOW. ⬇️ http://cultchron.substack.com/...

Share this thread

Read on Twitter

View original thread

Navigate thread

1/18