Published: April 14, 2025
1
1
17

Kit, I saw your article, and I have to say, I’m disappointed but not surprised. Your narrative is one-sided and riddled with self-serving justifications. While you may try to frame your actions as righteous or for the greater good, the reality is that.. 🧵

you've betrayed the very principles you claim to stand for. You paint yourself as a victim while conveniently ignoring the harm you've caused, not just to vio but to the broader community. vio, despite the accusations you levy against them, has consistently fought for what they

believed was right, often at great personal risk. Your decision to turn your back on SiegedSec and collaborate with authorities wasn’t about principle; it was about self-preservation. What’s truly egregious, though, is your attempt to discredit vio without acknowledging the

systemic issues they were up against. Instead of engaging in dialogue or seeking mutual understanding, you chose to go behind their back, weaponizing law enforcement in a way that could have devastating consequences.

If you were truly committed to the cause you claim to support, you would have worked to address your concerns internally. Instead, you’ve chosen the path of public spectacle, seemingly more interested in gaining sympathy than effecting meaningful change.

I strongly urge you to take a step back and reflect on the damage you’ve done, not just to vio, but to the community as a whole. Words have consequences, and your actions speak volumes about where your priorities lie.

Share this thread

Read on Twitter

View original thread

Navigate thread

1/6