The problem with real democracy is that people might vote in ways globalists don't like, and that's exactly what this article tries to "fix." The article leads with the premise: "[Brexit criticism] rests on the assumption... that popular majorities are not competent to deal

The solution? Taking away the ability to vote. Although Nodia says the idea is "taboo" - he also says in the same breath that the taboo is weakening. And NED did publish this. Quote: "So, if voters are truly incompetent (as they sometimes might be), no electoral mechanism will

I have said this many times, but I need to say this again. This is not some obscure left-wing journal. This is the the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a U.S. government-funded organization that operates entirely on taxpayer money. Members of Congress sit on its board,

The article makes clear that democratic participation is only acceptable as long as it doesn't threaten the institutions... which, in practice, means the authority of leftist elites. Quote: "These passions are crucial for dismantling autocratic regimes... yet in established

When people vote in ways elites dislike, it's labeled a "democratic deficit." This article argues, without irony, that the EU's design, which deliberately distances voters from decision-makers, is what keeps "democracy safe." No, this isn't satire. They mean it. Here's the

Again, NED is funded entirely by U.S. taxpayers and overseen by members of Congress. NED is publishing material that questions universal suffrage, defends anti-democratic structures, and openly promotes the idea that voters are too dangerous to be trusted with power. Why hasn't