2/ Tipu’s atrocities were not hearsay, he wrote about them himself. In his Persian letters (preserved in archives), Tipu boasts of: Forced conversions Temple destruction Desecration of Hindu idols Yet, NCERT textbooks call him "progressive."

3/ Malabar Massacres (Calicut, 1789–92): Tipu personally led ji had against Nairs and Moplahs. "I have forcibly converted 40,000 Hindus to Is l@m..."- Tipu in a letter to Sultan of Turkey. Temples burnt. Brahmins butchered. Cows slaughtered in sanctums. Still a "freedom

4/ Coorg Carnage: Tipu's army marched into Kodagu (Coorg), capturing over 80,000 people. Men were circumcised at swordpoint. Women r@ped and enslaved. Thousands deported to Srirangapatna and sold in Isl@ mic markets. This was no war of liberation. It was religious fascism.

5/ Melkote Massacre (Raya Gopura): Over 700 unarmed Iyengars, who refused to embrace his religion, were slaughtered inside the temple complex. Tipu’s army killed children in front of their mothers. The utsav idols were desecrated. Blood ran through the temple steps. This is

6/ Mangalore & South Canara: Catholic churches were razed. Over 60,000 Christians were forcibly converted, their lands seized, and families separated. His hatred for Christians was equal to his hatred for Hindus. Yet “secular historians” weep over his so-called

7/ Vikram Sampath notes: Tipu called himself “Gh@zi” – slayer of non-believers. He appealed to the Caliph of Turkey, styled himself a Muj@ hid, and framed his military campaigns as jih ad. Where’s the “secular king” they keep selling?

8/ Tipu wasn't anti-British out of patriotism. He just wanted French help to become the new Is l@mic ruler of Bharat. His vision was Sh@ria rule from Mysore to Delhi, not Swaraj. He despised Marathas, Nizam, and fellow Indians as much as the British.

9/ And yet… Congress governments celebrated Tipu Jayanti Leftist historians like Irfan Habib hailed him as a martyr Kannada textbooks portrayed him as a unifier When in truth, he was a religious suprem@cist who butchered Bharatmata’s children.

10/ Even his death (1799) was poetic justice. He died not fighting for freedom, but defending his kingdom from Marathas, Nizam, and British, all allies in that war. His own people opened the gate of Srirangapatna. There were no mourners.

11/ Time to burn the myth of Tipu. He was not India's “Che Guevara.” If Aurangzeb ruled Delhi, Tipu ruled Mysore with the same bloodthirst. If one destroyed Kashi and Mathura, Tipu razed Melkote and Mangalore.

12/ History has facts. Leftists gave us fiction. Let’s set the record straight. Please repost the first post and Follow @ManiYogini for more such threads. Jai Hind Jai Bharat 🇮🇳