@LinkCHOMPER “No third option” but you evidently support pedophiles feeding into their attractions through whatever means as per your bio where you’re pro-para… right. Definitely just innocent little ships you guys. I’m totally normal and functioning. Stop lying to people.

@DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER Thats not what that means , You are slow in the head and making up things to get angry over . You have a degree in psych You retard you're actually a disgrace to the field

@puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER lmao ignore this dude he follows furry nsfw accounts

@puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER Animals can't consent. This is the same logic as lolibros saying "well she's actually a 2938r765 year old demon so she's not a child!!" Your logic isn't consistent

@Frwecklewish @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER The difference between Lolis and furries is that a loli looks identical to a child and a furry only has some features of animals while having human anatomy. There is a very stark difference between a dog and a furry 😭 Unless someone is sexualizing them because they look like-

@burningtrashhh @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER Here's my counterargument: If furries aren't zoophilic because it's stylized. Then lolicon isn't pedophilic because it's also stylized and there is an obvious difference between a real child and a loli

@Frwecklewish @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER If you genuinely believe that a fantasy creature with human anatomy, mental state and language is zoophilic then 🤷‍♂️ as for lolis, tell me the physical difference between this irl girl and this pic real quick other then “one if fictional” vs the furry and dog

@burningtrashhh @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER The exaggerated eyes, the large head, the obviously cartoony stylization, the unrealistic appearance, the unnatural haircolor, etc.

@Frwecklewish @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER Okay but you notice how lolis have very similar anatomy to irl children vs the furry having completely different anatomy to the dog? Do you really not see the issue with sexualizing a child that has almost 1:1 proportions to an irl child excluding their head??

@burningtrashhh @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER If loli isn't a hyperrealistic drawing of an actual child, then there is no 1:1 proportions. That's just cope. You asked me the difference between a child and a loli and I gave you exactly that. If you don't find an issue sexualizing an animal with human traits then there should

@Frwecklewish @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER See, your wording is tripping you up. With that logic lolis would have to have adult traits which they do not because they are sexualized for being childlike and looking like children. What would fit your justification for loli is feral porn, which IS zoophilic and not reg furry

@burningtrashhh @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER and furries are being sexualized for having animal traits as well as animal genitalia. Because let's be honest, the good majority of anthro nsfw includes that part. So again, if furries aren't zoophilic for that then lolicons aren't pedophilic for sexualizing those traits either.

@Frwecklewish @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER A lot of furries believe that having nsfw with animal genitalia is zoophilia so yeah a lot of furries would agree with you on that part so idk what your point is there 🧍‍♂️

@burningtrashhh @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER I don't think that's true, if they did agree it was zoophilic then it wouldn't be included in so many works. But that's beside the point. You can't argue that furry isnt zoophilic cause it's stylized but disregard that explanation for lolicon no matter what it sexualizes. That's

@Frwecklewish @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER Lolicons originate from a book about a 12yo non anime girl getting preyed by her step father. Loli also includes any sexual portrayal of a little girl. That image of the girl showed up when I searched up loli and counts as under it even tho she isn’t fictional

@burningtrashhh @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER and furries originate from animals. Also to clarify, lolicon is only the sexualization of fictional characters. Just because that child showed up doesn't mean she's a loli. You're deflecting into irrelevant points now.

@burningtrashhh @puppiwinkle @DamienInTheDark @LinkCHOMPER and furries are the sexualization and erotic representation of animals. You've never debunked my point once, only doubled down over and over and over again.