Preventing scope creep and organizational drift is not censorship, it is conservation. It is the immune system of the existing identity against dilution of purpose. Marxists coopt an existing body/identity and invert its original purpose to create a blue ocean; a new market to

Examples: ●When politicians focus more on foreign interests than its citizens. (NGOs, Wars) ●When game developers stop producing entertaining games that the fan base wants in favor of their personal ideologies (gamergate) ●When a CEO diverts resources in favor of ulterior

Marxist tactics: Marxism attacks organizations in three primary ways. Leadership: In a company they typically target the founders for removal by involving them in scandal. Founders have Sweat Equity and care about an organization more than an average employee. They are the

Identity destruction: Marxism views traditional identities as obstacles to be overturned in Revolution. This can be something banal like a company communication policy or as grandiose as gender. Regardless, the “current thing” must change because progress demands it. And

If someone is consistently attempting to overturn established standars, traditions or identities you have a revolutionary Marxist on your hands. Bitcoins identity as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system stands in the way of the new identity they want for Bitcoin. By

Something that is everything is also nothing because it lacks a singular identity and purpose to be defended above all others. Bitcoin's identity as hard MONEY must be defended because that is the ONLY vector marxists have to attack it. Culture comes from Identity. What we do

Bitcoin is conservative: I often hear the argument made that Bitcoin is libertarian, but Bitcoin is also the most conservative asset ever to exist. 21 million forever, no free rides, proof of work only. I don't use conservative in the mainstream political sense. I use it in

I like Libertarians but Marxists know Libertarians can't defend themselves, and this is why so many marxists masquerade as Libertarians (parasitism, inversion). Why? because from the libertarian perspective any defense can be inverted as an offense. “Don't censor my peer-peer

Marxists attack language: Marxism is ego based and parasitic. Because of this Marxists will lie or use euphemisms to smuggle their actions inside of a moral framework. Euphemism: "Your promoting censorship" Translation: "You are impeding my will" "Censorship" is only the

You will recognize examples of this vocabulary destruction in culture war topics: Fat -> Fat Bodied, Homeless -> The Unhoused, Breastfeeding -> Chestfeeding, Mother -> Birthing person. By destroying the language they are fighting on a meta level. They cannot win on the

In conclusion: I forget who referred to Marxism as a “series of bitch moves” but that's the best way to understand how they think and act. They won't and can't fight fair or stand on principle because they have an immoral ideology and they don't have those skills. Instead of

If all other tactics fail they default to credentialism. The appeal to Authority we saw during covid lockdowns by governments and regulators is the perfect example. “Trust the science, trust the experts, trust the devs...” “Knots is only one person! vs. an entire team of

I'll leave you now with some examples of marxist language and behavior by @w_s_bitcoin @callebtc @brian_trollz

@w_s_bitcoin @callebtc @brian_trollz @PortlandHODL https://x.com/nazgulHODL/statu...

@14g23h34 So Marxism is akin to Lucifer

@ValleyPig Lucifer is in fact the inspiration for Marxism according to Karl Marx himself

@14g23h34 @asanoha_gold More leftists, generally. Review Conquest’s Laws of Politics. Everything comes down to power and wielding it responsibly. Conquest’s laws: 1) Everyone is conservative about what he knows best. 2) Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.

@rorshockbtc @asanoha_gold Agreed, the language is difficult as it comes loaded with a lot of assumptions by the reader about what right wing, conservative, left wing, revolutionary, Etc means

@14g23h34 Bro, excellent thread. And awesome job pulling back the curtain on the rhetoric. Very astute observations.

@SatsScholar 🙏

@14g23h34 This is a lot of words to let everyone know how retarded you are.

@Skipjohnson6420 I love adhominem😍

@14g23h34 Question about Marxism, more than this specific example (tho I do care) ... do they know what they are doing? Are they just acting in this learned Marxist way? Or are they consciously Marxist and living out that ideology deliberately?

@RobasMackay In my experience very few people running the Marxist code are aware at an ontological level. In universities or governments or diversity Equity inclusion circles there are most definitely Marxist theorists reading the source material but the majority of people are just running

@14g23h34 Are you sure it's Marxist? To me it looks like Fewish who runs the international banks?

@14g23h34 Excellent analysis, my commie senses had been tingling for awhile. Def Marxist subversion.

@14g23h34 Fascinating take. Had not considered this perspective

@14g23h34 This was my instinct based on the latest attacks against knots and the supporters of the core devs' actions. Acting cowardly, underhanded, arguing in bad faith, being deceitful, being hateful. With a strange, rebellious lgbtq flavor. All the classic hallmarks of evil; not just

@14g23h34 Watching the immune system of the Bitcoin community activated is a marvel. Great thread.

@14g23h34 This is pure signal, and so well written. It validates everything I've been concluding from general intuition, extrapolation and interpolation - but I don't have any experience nor any words to express it. But you do and did. You sir are incredibly valuable to our movement. More

@14g23h34 Eloquently spoken sir 🤝🏽

@14g23h34 Very nicely articulated