People need to understand the difference: the club sent serious offers for Woltemade because they believed he could be a long-term replacement for Kane. Jackson, on the other hand, is brought in because the club feels he can give Kompany flexibility across multiple positions.
In terms of squad planning, he comes to replace Coman and Muller at once, not the same profile but as a versatile forward capable to cover for Diaz, Kane, and Musiala.
@Der_Augustus So he is also a playmaker and a LW?
@Bayernkmr He can play the Gnabry role centrally, allowing Kane to drop deep in the build-up and can play LW vs most clubs. You can't expect top performances across all positions but a solid backup job.
@Der_Augustus Und mal zum Vergleich: das Jahr Coutinho lag damals bei 32/33 Millionen Euro.
@Der_Augustus Jackson has never played in the champions league, was a bench-warmer at chelsea, his stats are low compared to the price asked by Chelsea. I'm not happy with this deal at all, I hope I will be wrong.
@Der_Augustus Smart analysis as usual! Unfortunately most of FT here donnot see like this if not blaming the bosses and whole club😫
@Der_Augustus Finsik Asslani remember this name .this guy is good
@Der_Augustus The question is who will be our long term replacement for kane? We should extend Kane soon and wait how woltemade turns out. He will flop in the prem and will be available for half of the price soon. But if Jackson performs really well we could sign him aswell
@Der_Augustus He will be great for you