Published: September 2, 2025
195
590
4.2k

@RayDalio se um presidente olhasse mais para a economia olharia mais para o seus eleitor e não para seu orgulho. sou seu vã que pena que não tem seu livros em portugens

@RayDalio @grok analyse and provide a predictive analysis of what could happen in next couple of years from now on ?

@RayDalio If you didnt reveal how opposite your timings were at cash is trash at last cycle top and cash is good at last bottom, I would have taken this as terrific confirmation bias. I see you as nothing but danger wrapped on truth, now

@RayDalio So... You are as much of a coward as the business "leaders" that you criticized. Go get those shares of IG Farben.

@RayDalio Well it’s on you for always being very vague

@RayDalio Ray, why don't you simply publish the complete questions and answers?

@RayDalio Your responses to question 6 and 8 are skipped.

@RayDalio Fabian Times is no longer worth the time to read.

@RayDalio Regarding #12 on Mamdani, there is a a huge difference between what the Administration is doing and what Mamdani advocates. The Administration is trying to fix deeper problems and make things better while Mamdani is trying to destroy. The left doesn't care about the spending.

@RayDalio Tgis is not a denial of the FT headline or article. Shame on you Ray Dalio.

@RayDalio shame u waited till last para before mentioning climate change as i could have stopped reading much earlier

@RayDalio @grok compare the financial times article and what was written by them with Ray's post above of his entire response. was the financial times honest and accurate in it's reporting of his response? rate their honesty and accuracy on this article on a scale of 1 to 10.

@RayDalio For once, recently, I actually thought you were going to stand up to the wannabe dictator in the Whiteh House. Sad.

@RayDalio Ray, FT’s questions are 8 months pregnant with left leaning bias. I’m amazed you were willing to answer them at all. It was clear where the article was going irrespective of your answers. Some of your responses are missing from the article.

@RayDalio It happens everywhere.

@RayDalio I notice u do not discuss the negative compounding effects of INTEREST ON DEBT-debt service currently @ 13% Fed Spending-impossible2payback by design due 2 fractional reserves by Central entity2members not beholden2U.S.? Y do WTP pay4 currency creation if 4 sustaining a nation?

@RayDalio One factual mistake. You say the $1T interest cost is in addition to the $2T deficit. That’s not true, the interest is a component of the $7T of spending and therefore a component of the $2T deficit.

@RayDalio If you did anything with FT and didn’t see that coming it really calls into question any of your perspectives on the future.

@RayDalio Call it what you want I just call it we’re screwed. Good news is the whole world is as well. My question is which country survives this debacle first.

@RayDalio I think in number 2., that these fact does not matter because to access market options either you have dollar or another currency denominated by dollars. In that sense, as an "asset" dollar is the worst but the best for market options.

@RayDalio you should have been more attentive to the way they formulate the questions, the bias is obvious already there.

@RayDalio I am Jack's total lack of surprise. People who still bother with legacy media need committing to a mental institution. Hey @FT why did you misrepresent Ray Dalio? Piss poor "journalism" and "journalists"

@RayDalio @dampedspring I’d be v surprised if anyone actually cares

@RayDalio We all know legacy media will take chunks of story or interviews to fit into their narratives. Thanks for publishing your interview here on X.

@RayDalio Thank you for taking the time to clarify and just further proof mass media can not be trusted at all.

@RayDalio Thank you for being transparent.

@RayDalio FT didn’t mischaracterize you. But you saying that it did shows that you are, sadly, a gutless coward who’s afraid of Trump. Pretty pathetic, Ray.

@RayDalio Anyone who has been quoted by the press would gain an understanding that their ability to accurately report on what was said is often lacking. I once asked a local paper reporter why he'd misquoted a number I gave him by a factor of 1000x he said the editor didn't like it..

@RayDalio Anything on your former mentee Sean Diddy Combs?

@RayDalio This does help clarify but it seems that the FT article was just more blunt and pointed about the criticisms. Obviously, FT already had a viewpoint in mind when you read the questions so was looking to validate that rather than provide a more nuanced article.

@RayDalio The damage has already been done. Sad, but true. More people read the FT than you X postings.

@RayDalio Thanks for this thorough analysis. However, it is naive to assume that a journalist will reproduce detailed written responses verbatim. There will always be some summarizing or paraphrasing. My advice is to always insist on a final check of the article before it is published.

@RayDalio You haven’t been right about anything in the last decade.

@RayDalio Well done for exposing the ever partisan and politically motivated FT.

@RayDalio You did an interview with a propaganda machine and they made propaganda out of it? Who would have thought.

@RayDalio Glad to have read your answers here and not in the FT! How should ordinary folks position themselves for unimaginable changes of the next 5y?

Share this thread

Read on Twitter

View original thread

Navigate thread

1/37