@natalieben @grok Would you kindly define bimodal distributions for our friend here?

@natalieben Every single person in the red groups is female. Every one in the blue groups is male. The study actually requires the sex binary in order to posit any conclusions. No one argues that the binary nature of sex requires there to be zero crossover in all biological functions or

@natalieben I'm not a biologist, but can you explain the third human sex to me? The human sex that doesn't produce either eggs nor sperm? Please enlighten me.

@natalieben You should try to understand how graphs work before posting nonsense… Is a “third sex” on a different graph? 😂

@natalieben Who? This NASA Scientist is the “expert” on sex related characteristics? Lol

@natalieben You are not a serious person.

@natalieben It does when it comes to gender/sex among humans. And your chart literally breaks it into “male” and “female.” So your chart/example RELIES on binaries, you simpleton.

@natalieben Behold- a binary

@natalieben Is there an overlap in penis size?

@natalieben Nature absolutely does do "binaries", obviously. This is dumbest, least scientific thing I've seen from the lunatic left in easily the last 15 minutes. Hard to keep up.

@natalieben A) Your data contradict you. B) The debate is not about actual genetic anomalies. It's about gaslighting genetically normal kids into thinking they can choose their sex and switch at will.

@natalieben Emma seems to have good fun. I hope she shares her vast experiences with dsd patients.

@natalieben Why not just write a simple tweet that says "I'm an idiot" and get straight to the point?

@natalieben Perhaps you should sit down with a Primary School maths teacher 🤷🏻‍♂️

@natalieben Read the room you traitorous cunt. You women would happily prostrate yourselves to your trans god. You have no idea what you’re talking about. BTW. This is the best ratio ever.

@natalieben I guess the Male and Female part confuses you huh, that’s ok, I’m sure you’re great at picking up stray cats.

@natalieben Alive / Dead Positive charge / Negative charge Predator / Prey Light / Dark This lost is by no means exhaustive. And I don't think anyone would care about your trans blah blah if you weren't pushing it in our kids. Stop trying to make us weak. Stop messing with our youth.

@natalieben This is truly the most stupid thing I’ve ever seen from you science deniers. Here’s another one: men and women are both born with two eyes. Therefore sex is non binary. Pure stupidity.

@natalieben @grok does the "OvaTes" graph, with its zero-overlap distribution, strongly support the idea that sex is binary at its core, defined by gonadal and gametic differences? Doesn't this prove the opposite of what @natalieben is claiming?

@natalieben Why are you retarded? Fuck even the troons do binary. Bisexual bi as in two. Get it? MTF or FTM from one to the other. get it?

@natalieben Either you have no clue how to read the study or the graphs or you are just another dishonest freak. My bet is on the latter.

@natalieben Read your own chart. Jfc.

@natalieben We must come up with a solution to people like this subhuman woman spreading her ideas without "IDIOT IDEA" plastered next to all of her ideas.

@natalieben That's nonsense. Literally every biological system is a series of binary decisions - receptors are bound (on) or not (off). Biological systems form normal distributions because Galton Boards form from sequences of binary decisions: https://youtube.com/shorts/Twc...

@natalieben I did a similar study that proves some horses are cars and vice versa.

@natalieben You have a verified government account But this is satire? Right?

@natalieben As a biologist this is stupid. All clad nomenclature is binary in classification, those who have A attribute and those who don't until you have individual species. Then sex is a binary, no such thing as spectrum, clearly outlined by the data shown.

@natalieben As a guy with OTDSD. Fuck off I am a guy.

@natalieben "The usual narrative for sex-related differences between individuals is based on binary gametic sex. Such a binary distinction is a hallmark of most sexually reproducing species" from the study you are talking about simpleton

@natalieben How very retarded

@natalieben Are you joking? I'm an engineer and data scientist. I don't know if I've ever seen an easier distribution for binary classification. There is literally zero overlap in these distributions.

@natalieben Natalie, read the room, absolutely no one believes this bullshit anymore. Look at the OvaTes graph. That's called binary. Wake the fuck up.

@natalieben What does it take to reproduce in mammals?

@natalieben So because NON-reproductive organs and other tissues are primarily nondisparate between the sexes, the entire mammalian sex concept is disproven? That's like saying that because our arms and legs have the same number of joints and are covered with skin, humans are quadrupedal.

@natalieben I do not think you understand basic statistics… but you are a Green after all…

@natalieben What a semantic mess. It does bimodal, as the graphs clearly show and that's what everyone sane is referring to. It does't do exclusive, non-overlapping binaries but that's a non-issue and nobody cares. "Some people are born without legs therefore humans are not bipedal" is just