Original source: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/9...

A huge amount of the problem is simply that students do not seem to have been trained to look up unfamiliar words in dictionaries as they read.

The instructors explicitly allow the students to do this as part of the task but almost none of them do so. *I* had to look up a word in the dictionary--Micahelmas--when I first read the opening passage in question

Thinking about just that opening paragraph. To understand it you need to: 1) Recognize some terms more common in Britain than in America: Michaelmas, Lord Chancelor, Holborn Hill. 2) Recognize antiquated terms ("chimney pot" instead of "chimney" or "chimney stack")

3) Know the Bible well enough to catch the allusion to the flood and understand why a 19th c author would be putting a dinosaur before the flood

4) Have some understanding that industrializing Britain created enough smog to block out the sun 5) Able to interpret figurative language (the ashflakes as snowflakes wearing mourning colors for the "death" of the sun, just a poetic and clever way to describe #4)

6) Deal with many claused sentences, especially those with parentheticals or asides that seem to negate part of the main clause ("if this day ever broke"). 7) Understand financial terms like "compound interest"

So in the study they have the students read out loud and interpret what they are reading as they go. Very revealing. Here is one student who misreads the passage because she does not recognize the word "Megolasarus" and does not look it up.

The poor readers also tend to simplify the meaning of sentences when asked to interpret it

Compare this to how one of the successful readers does it:

The study author's comments on this last example are useful:

For many students of English literature studied, reading seems very vibes based. You get a general vibe based idea of how the passage *feels* .... and then you read sparknotes to fill in the gaps.

There is an entire way of teaching reading that goes something like "you need to get really good at guessing the meaning of words from context instead of looking them up." I wonder if that is one of the culprits here.

Lol he is 100% correct https://x.com/PatrickDFarley/s...

The allusion is to this ANTEDILUVIAN Biblical passage:

I have been thinking a lot about what you could do with eighth and ninth graders to reverse this trend. I think my old solution of focusing their education on poems, essays, and short stories is probably the right approach:

focus on incredibly close readings, make them memorize reams of poetry to build up their store of literary allusions and to get them used to interpreting figurative language, spend obscene amounts of time parsing sentences and identifying paragraph level literary techniques.

https://x.com/hazeyjanei/statu... People keep saying that but folks I am not talking about childhood. Looking up words should be a *lifelong* habit. I probably looked up more than 200 words when I read Blood Meridian this year.

I rarely read a work of classic literature without using a dictionary--often dozens of times!

https://x.com/SWGoldman/status... This is correct. IMHO there is a strong argument to be made that American high school students should basically get a semester of British history

@Scholars_Stage Spent the whole thread thinking, “man, we need to start teaching poetry again,” and you got it. Some of these subjects have such a prosaic approach to reading, which you can see a little bit in how often they talk about not knowing or trying to figure out “what’s going on” or

@Scholars_Stage Start a poetry close-reading TikTok account (not sure if I'm 49% or 51% serious on that one)

@Scholars_Stage I would add sentence composition via imitation of sophisticated literary models.

@Scholars_Stage The hyperbolic version of this: https://x.com/knrd_z/status/18...

@Scholars_Stage I think you should also concentrate on starting kids with contemporary literature, so that they can get used to figurative language without having to learn the names of objects that haven't existed in daily life for at least a century. *Then* you can take them to the classics.

@Scholars_Stage ie Disciplined effort using traditional methods works Who'd a thunk it!