I admire leftist lolicons because they're willing to stand with their worldview and what they consider is right despite knowing the people who share the same worldview as them would tear them up to pieces if they found out they're a lolicon. It means they're their own person...
@TiraaSaja It means he's ideologically consistent and the world may be healing. nazi lolicons never made sense, as you can't take pride in enjoying obscene media while supporting those who aim to censor it woke antis never made sense either, as you can't water down the word pedophile --
@TiraaSaja -- while still claiming to support victims
@TiraaSaja the only thing accomplished by statements such as """lolicon = pedophile""" scapegoating a whole not-necessarily-pedophile group... is diluting the word pedophile, which assists actual pedophiles. the only group with any real incentive to do that are pedophiles themselves.
@TiraaSaja beyond that, proshipping is woke. inherently. what proshipping is is the general stance of being anti censorship. and that's it. no further implication. so, anti as the self-prescribed opposite stance = pro censorship. once a line is drawn for what sort of content qualifies --
@TiraaSaja as "objectionable", it is easy to move. first it's lewd lolis, then it's "weird porn", then all porn, then all queer representation at all even sfw, and god knows where they'll go from there but it won't be good. ergo, opposing censorship is progressive. sometimes opposing --
@TiraaSaja censorship means defending shit you're not personally comfortable with. if you won't do it because all art is worth preserving, do it to stop the leopards from eating *your* face. I am so sorry for spamming your notifications OP /thread