Published: October 4, 2025
53
55
524

A curious case of Zaggle issuing warrants at 63% above CMP. People often get excited and end up taking disproportionate bets! Read and understand carefully ๐Ÿ’ฏ Zaggle is a โ‚น4,663 crore market-cap company, out of which promoters hold 44.2% i.e. ~โ‚น2,061 crore. Now, they are

Image in tweet by ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด

@vandit_jain1994 Bhai bat to sahi hai but 15 cr ka risk lena bhi badi bat hai.. though not a big deal for promoters but it shows confidence and ye choti choti cheeze hi confidence enhance karti hai but ye perspective se mai 100% agree karta hu n iske basis per you can't just blindly buy the share

@ashishca13 U can surely invest based on growth outlook and valuations. Just saying for those who blindly invest based on hype. And bhai..15 cr..is just peanuts as compared to their total worth.. Not even 1%... And the rewards can be massive.

@vandit_jain1994 Just adding, Also the promoters sold shares worth 100cr in Q3 FY25 after lock in expired. Why are they doing it? they have 600cr cash in balance sheet. This is nothing but financial engineering unless there is a hostile risk takeover, which is unlikely at this point.

@abshekkolli Completely agree.

@vandit_jain1994 Another perspective They buy 15cr today @567 I buy say 5L @347 They work hard to bring it to 33%โˆ† I wait and watch If it goes above, both benefit If it stays same or down, he loses 15cr. I go down as per price Looks fair Met Mr Raj yesterday in an event

@VisweswarRaoKa3 @567 @347 U can invest based on growth outlook and valuations. Just saying, people don't understand how warrants work and blindly invest based on hype.

@vandit_jain1994 Other than warrants, Zaggle is undervalued as well Definitely worth to keep on watchlist They raised guidance recently too

@MrTalkStock U can surely invest based on growth potential and Valuations. Warrants come as a secondary thing.

@vandit_jain1994 If I invest in this it will be purely cos of its future growth guidance and management commentary, these warrants will come in the secondary part. Understanding of business model, financials and management tone, guidance will build conviction.

@DhawalDoshi5 Perfect bhai ๐Ÿ‘

@vandit_jain1994 You r right.... Now a days promoters think that coming up with a preferential issue or Warrant issue.... Limit the downside of their stock price.... And in turn manipulate the whole lot of retail Investors

@strongwoman2020 Yes many promoters do that.

@vandit_jain1994 option buying at its best ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

@chuktima ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

@vandit_jain1994 What about Bennet & Coleman investment. That's a marquee investor. It's a biased post. The company has upgraded it's guidance to 45 per cent growth And also highlight the clause of 15 per cent.

@patriotpareek If anyone wants to invest, he should invest based on growth potential and Valuations, not on the basis of hype created by warrants. This is a completely unbiased post, people are becoming biased just because of warrants. If u read carefully, Everything that is written there is a

@vandit_jain1994 Bhai upside and downside potential you have exaggerated as per your convenience? How can 15 Cr risk give 1300 Cr upside? Remaining 20601 Cr is irrelevant in the calculation here

@anuj_lunawat Iโ€™m not saying Zaggle is doing this. Zaggle seem to be a good company and people can invest on the basis of growth potential and valuations. But youโ€™ll realize that many promoters often use such tactics to pump their stock. They buy a small quantity, and when people notice this,

@vandit_jain1994 Valid Point, Quantum also to be seen alongwith the Instrument.

@vandit_jain1994 In this case of Warrant of Zaggle, they are issuing at Rs. 567 so can we interpret that there may be more chance of Stock price will move upward from CMP?

@Dr_KN_Chaudhari No view on that.

@vandit_jain1994 SEBI ICDR rule is there. According to the rule Under SEBIโ€™s ICDR (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, the minimum price for warrants (typically in a preferential issue) must be determined based on the Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of the companyโ€™s

@SAMSUMIT123456 It is for the minimum price... maximum price has no limit.

@vandit_jain1994 Very well explained

@vandit_jain1994 Rather use precious,time & Data on Analysing business and it's potential

@Viralkb That is what my point was. Avoid hype, invest on basis of growth and valuations.

@vandit_jain1994 Amazing analysis

@vandit_jain1994 You had explained it in very nice and simple way.

@Anjireddy1ca Thank you ๐Ÿ™‚

@vandit_jain1994 Beautifully explained

@Abhi_nit_1312 Thank you

Share this thread

Read on Twitter

View original thread

Navigate thread

1/35