Published: October 14, 2025
13
8
171

"Security Researcher" claims they evade all AVs easily. But the sample they used for testing is not malicious, it is just calc.exe. I know the industry is not perfect, but testing malware detection with non-malicious payload is ridiculous. https://www.reddit.com/r/antiv...

If process injection happens, AVs actually check what's being injected. Process injection alone does not make something malicious. It is also done by clean software.

@bettersafetynet Security tools, debuggers, profilers, monitoring tools, diagnostic tools do process injection. You really want AV to quarantine them all?

@FuzzVector If Lolbins are used to load malware, it should be detected -- but then you'd have a malicious payload somewhere in the chain. Attacks that do not involve malware are out of scope for AV protection. They are relevant for EDR/MEDR though.

@DanielGmez3070 Since when does AV claim to protect from that?

Share this thread

Read on Twitter

View original thread

Navigate thread

1/5