Published: October 20, 2025
4
8
75

🚨Peer Reviewed Evidence: VASCO Just Changed the Game for Disclosure Dr. Beatriz Villarroel and her VASCO team just published two new papers, accepted by Scientific Reports and PASP. What they found could redefine the UFO debate forever.🧵👇

Image in tweet by Skywatch Signal

2/ VASCO analyzed pre-Sputnik sky plates, images of the night sky from before 1957, decades before the first satellites. They found short lived transients, bright, star-like flashes that appear and vanish within minutes. And then they noticed something strange... these events

3/ When the team cross referenced the dates of those transients with above ground nuclear tests and UFO sighting reports, the data lined up. Statistically significant correlation, confirmed through peer review.

4/ Transients were 45% more likely to occur within Âą1 day of a nuclear detonation. Each additional UFO report on a given day increased transient counts by 8.5%. The correlation between nuclear testing and UFO reports themselves were well beyond chance.

5/ When mapping transients across the sky, the team found a 22σ deficit inside Earth’s shadow, a region blocked from sunlight. Almost no flashes where sunlight couldn’t reach. That’s consistent with reflections from highly reflective flat surfaces in orbit, before orbiting

6/ That last point is seismic. If confirmed, it implies that something artificial was in Earth orbit before the Space Age, an impossibility under the current timeline of human civilization, and yet here we are, with Nature’s own Scientific Reports publishing the data.

7/ Together with their earlier MNRAS paper on the “nine vanishing lights of 1950,” these results form a peer reviewed triptych, three independent publications, three sets of reviewers, three converging anomalies. Astronomy is now doing what disclosure hearings can’t by testing

8/ For decades, scientists claimed “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Well, the data is now here, in digitized sky plates from the 1940s and 50s. And they show a pattern of unknown luminous activity synchronized with human nuclear detonations.

9/ This pattern matches witness testimony across 70 years, that something watches, reacts, or intervenes when humanity crosses a threshold of destructive capability. Now, it’s not philosophy or folklore, it’s undeniable, statistical astrophysics.

10/ VASCO’s results don’t prove “ET,” but they do something far more important for disclosure. They make the question scientifically unavoidable. When Nature journals report orbital anomalies correlated with nuclear events, the debate moves from belief to evidence.

11/ For governments, that’s a new kind of problem. They can dismiss witnesses, and classify videos, but they can’t redact peer review. Science has just entered the disclosure process and it is going to make things real interesting, real fast.

12/ This is where the conversation shifts from secrecy to science. Because if reflective, structured objects existed in Earth orbit before Sputnik… then someone, or something beat us to space.

14/ The implications are clear. If the VASCO project can trace UAP correlations through archival astronomy, then every national observatory is sitting on untapped disclosure data. Disclosure is no longer a political act.

15/ Peer review was always the final gatekeeper and VASCO just walked through it. Congratulations to Beatriz and the VASCO team, thank you for all the hard work. #VASCO #BeatrizVillarroel #Disclosure #UAP #ScientificReports #Astronomy #NuclearTests #UFO #SkywatchSignal

@UAPWatchers Nothing but defective plates. She’s another nut job.

@UAPWatchers Love this kind of story where people find weird and interesting stuff in among routine stuff.

@UAPWatchers That's more like it!

Yes, I'm that Dan Sherman. Thank you to Jesse (@AlchemyAmerican) for doing such a great job with the podcast. He was a gracious host and I'm happy that a new generation has been exposed to what's happened in the distant past and maybe lead to answers about the here and now.

🚨Ross Coulthart just said what many suspected About Amy Eskridge Ross doesn’t believe anti-gravity researcher Amy Eskridge took her own life. He claims to have seen photos of directed energy burns she reportedly suffered before her death, and emails where she expressed fear for

Wonderful news. 🌟💫✨ Our two new VASCO papers are now peer-reviewed, accepted and published — and they reveal some extraordinary things: - We find statistically significant correlations between short-lived transients on pre-Sputnik sky plates, UFO sightings, and above-ground

Image in tweet by Skywatch Signal
Image in tweet by Skywatch Signal

The mind that can see without eyes— is the same mind that remembers what reality forgets. No cues. No trickery. Only perception doing what science says it can’t. #Mindsight #ESP #Parapsychology #TelepathyTapes #UFOtwitter

Share this thread

Read on Twitter

View original thread

Navigate thread

1/21