So this tweet received an ungodly amount of vitriol and unprecedented amount of hate, and while I understand that deep analytical content is not good to post, I figured I'd make a big post regarding it. This isn't about who is right or wrong, it's about explaining why I made the
@LSXYZ9 This herald statement is inaccurate unless you mean herald crashing and not taking the tower, towers often result in minimum 5% swings in win probability in pro. It comes down to the same thing we talked about before right, individuals can have opinions that are well thought out
@tak_01_ yeah wrote more on disc
@LSXYZ9 People have a problem with you stating your opinion as fact and then doubling down when you get proven wrong not with your analysis
@WyllytheEGOIST what did I say that was fact that was then "proven wrong" ?
@LSXYZ9 Has nobody read the post? Because I can't see anyone point out that 4th screenshot is missing lol
@Andraeyus twitter error on processing i guess upon post. and you can't edit in images.
@LSXYZ9 Yes I am sure you made that statement with this thesis already in mind. Nah man, you made a nonsense hyperbolic take on a comp and then lost, and now youre doubleing down on it and trying to justify it like you had a Jimmy Neutron brain blast in the 20s you looked at the comp.
@MyNamesAngel11 it is in mind because I say some of these things on stream lol
@LSXYZ9 if you want to break something down like this, make a video and link it. nobody wants to read through all this in text format.
@itbetk Thank you for proving my point. Also a video is arguably worse but that's a different topic. But I addressed it anyway.
@LSXYZ9 Bro, what the heck happened to you? Honestly. It’s quite impossible to follow you nowadays. Jesus Christ
@Andrezhii ? what lol. you're unironically complaining that I just wrote an analytical edu piece lol
@LSXYZ9 So u assume is two robots, and no one play?
@Ith_777 no the opposite actually, that's the irony with people like yourself. if I actually assumed robots my comments, tierlists and other things would be actually wild. and you'd have things like xerath, lane karthus and other things being talked about all the time.
@LSXYZ9 LS, its just videogame calm down
@highcgs well that's the funny thing, the things being discussed might be about the video game LoL, but the skillset and thought processes don't belong to it. so you can use it for other areas of life, games, or things.
@LSXYZ9 First of all I read all of it and I completely agree with the points you make. As expected a lot of comments legit prove that most people don't really care about having a proper discussion, they are just talking because they feel attacked on their personal and superficial beliefs
@Lox4ki Correct, it doesn't matter what I write or say, to them I'm just wrong. Therein lies the problem w/ analytical content in the first place - It isn't about what you can demonstrate or discuss or prove, it's simply about being liked. And naturally edu creation is usually/often
@LSXYZ9 Now imagine how it can also be frustrating when I say "ADCs have up to 110+ armor" (Kalista has 112) and you say "i don't believe that to be true and "prove" it by picking a random ADC that only had 93. You over simplified my argument about how base resistances (especially
@LSXYZ9 Could I get the condensed version please, don't worry I'll cite you when I steal your answer for my 50 word essay
@LSXYZ9 I wish more people had been openly arguing with you prior to the game being played. Seems the major point of contention was the fact that VKS just outplayed them despite your prediction. Also thanks for writing in this much detail,I learned a lot reading through it.
@LSXYZ9 tldr;
@LSXYZ9 dito isso vitoria da vivo keyd stars.
@LSXYZ9 Ain't nobody got time to read that
@LSXYZ9 meu amigo kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk






