@RichardGage_911 Dude. For real? Maybe it had something to do with the the large commercial airplanes full of jetfuel that slammed into it at 400+ MPH?? Do ya think?

@RichardGage_911 @WarFrontIntel Yes @grok you better explain

@RichardGage_911 I’ve been in construction for 27 years. I said it the day of 9/11 and I’ll say it now, the building went down exactly like a planned explosion of a building demolition. The jet fuel theory is BS it burned so fast and it would have never been hot enough to melt steel beams or

@RichardGage_911 Did a 747 plane hit this building at 700km /h? Just asking questions you know

@RichardGage_911 Thats because the WTC was built very differently. I used to visit the WTC and there were few if any columns going through the floors. Most of the support came from the sides of the building. Thats why the windows were so narrow. The floors were trusses rather than traditional

@RichardGage_911 It was more than mere fire. WTC collapsed on 9/11 due to plane impacts dislodging fireproofing, exposing steel to intensely hot jet fuel fires. Heated beams sagged, floors failed, and the upper structure’s collapsing weight triggered a domino effect of progressive collapse.

@RichardGage_911 I don’t know did a plane that run into it? At a high rate of speed?

@RichardGage_911 How many thousands of gallons of jet fuel were in that Chinese skyscraper?

@RichardGage_911 @a_collinson8 Look up the word “kinetic energy” And you’re an architect? Have you never worked with structural engineers? Call one. Maybe they can explain it to you Fucking idiot

@RichardGage_911 From September 11th, 2001, 00:01 until 23:59 different laws of physics applied.

@RichardGage_911 I have another question. Why did these plane leave a massive plane/wind shaped holes before exploding, but that air India flight that ran into a building at just a slightly lower speed and a full fuel tank had its wings sheered off and didn't explode till it hit the ground?

@RichardGage_911 The comparison ignores critical differences. WTC 7 suffered severe debris damage from the North Tower's collapse and uncontrolled fires on multiple floors for seven hours without sprinklers, leading to thermal expansion and a progressive collapse. The Chinese building, likely

@RichardGage_911 We would have to know structural parameters of said buildings to figure out why one was more susceptible to collapse than the other. To be sure, the Chinese building was not exposed to an impact from a large aircraft traveling at more than 100kph. And fuel can burn very hotter

@RichardGage_911 The two building yeh sort of plausible BUT what about tower/building 7? No planes at all yet collapsed in the exact same manner??! That’s the weirdest bit by far that has no rational explanation not even a fake one.

@RichardGage_911 You say your an architect and you dont know the answer 🤦 holy fuck there is a lot of stupid people in the world today 🤷

@RichardGage_911 You need evidence. You're retarded question answers nothing. Fire does NOT = fire and a huge plane impacting the building with the force that it did. Come on, get a brain. Borrow one if you have to

@RichardGage_911 Not sure but maybe the fact that the towers fire was started by a 767 weighing around 300,000 pounds crashing "through" a few floors hauling ass, not a kitchen fire.

@RichardGage_911 Neither did Grenfell towers WTC7 is a loaded gun where they would have taken months to load the explosives 🧨 in to the building for a controlled demolition. Same with WTC1 & WTC2 Lucky Larry was best buddies with Satanyahu. How many millions of Muslims have died since 911?

@RichardGage_911 The skin, not the structure is on fire. WTC7 was weakened because it was directly affected by the collapse of WTC1 and WTC2, the tallest buildings in the USA which were 370 feet away. Three hundred and seventy feet. Comprehend?

@RichardGage_911 Because of the mechanical scouring of the fire protection off the beams and columns. As someone who has had to cut metal with a torch it is impossible unless you scrape off the fp. The force of the plane and explosion would easily do that.

@RichardGage_911 They build better. Besides, not the same design.

@RichardGage_911 Because it was based on a fundamentally different engineering principle you utter fucking gombeen.

@RichardGage_911 A rhetorical question? Since most Architects already understand what happened? The steel trusses supporting the concrete floors failed under heat stress from the fires. The collapses occurred in a domino effect. The impact of one or two collapsing floors exceeded the support

@RichardGage_911 Why don’t you fly a B767 into it at over 500mph and see how it does.

@RichardGage_911 The ground all around it had just been struck by debri from two massive towers collapsing and wrecking the entire underground plaza is one major difference I spotted.

@RichardGage_911 There is no plane crashed into the building. Duh..

@RichardGage_911 The absence of profound structural damage preceding the fire?

@RichardGage_911 world trade tower were demolished (planed demolition) even before the two planes hits.

@RichardGage_911 Tower on fire because of electrical issues and tower on fire because of structurally compromised airliner jet impact and a fresh load of jet fuel are not the same.

@RichardGage_911 Do you think maybe the impact of a large jet airplane and the immediate dispersal of thousands of gallons of jet fuel were a factor? Eh gads.

@RichardGage_911 Maybe the giant airplane hitting it at 500mph had a little something to do with it collapsing.

@RichardGage_911 If you're an architect, YOU SHOULD KNOW. Two atomic bombs went off in close proximity to 7 WTC. You've never heard of "earthquake" bombs? It's a miracle that 7 WTC didn't collapse immediately after the first tower.

@RichardGage_911 China builds inferior quality, low cost buildings, that is why it did not collapse.

@RichardGage_911 The tree buildings that collapsed at NY on 9/11 are the only steel framed buildings in history to ever collapse from fire. Let that sink in.

@RichardGage_911 Was the skyscraper in China hit by a 747 going 600 mph with a tank full of jet fuel in it? I’m no engineer, but even I can see how that might fracture an entire foundation and infrastructure of a skyscraper

@RichardGage_911 It was built differently? The Chinese building did not sustain the impact and explosion of a commercial airliner at full throttle? If it did, was the fuel payload the same, was the attack vector different? I mean...c'mon.