1/ Neo-Marxism has always viewed the family as the “first site of oppression”. From Engels’ Origin of the Family to Marcuse’s Eros and Civilisation, the Marxist project sought to destroy traditional morality by sexu@lising the youth. That very ideology under the pretext of
2/ Herbert Marcuse declared in Eros and Civilisation (1955): “A non-repressive order is possible only through the liberation of sexu@lity.” He promised a “non-repressive civilisation” through polymorphous sexu@lity. The strategy: dismantle moral restraint, redefine indulgence as
3/ India’s Intrusion on Civilisation report shows the result of importing that ideology. Lowering the age from 18 to 16 would: • legitimise child marriage, • increase teen pregnancy, • and let predators mask exploitation as “consent”. That’s not emancipation, it’s engineered
4/ Science disagrees with the radicals. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (2019) found children of teen mothers suffer chronic under-nutrition and cognitive deficits. WHO warns: “Initiation of sexual activity while they lack adequate knowledge … places adolescents at higher
5/ Neuroscience backs the law, not the lobby. The prefrontal cortex, the region for impulse control and risk assessment, matures only around age 25 (US NIH, 2018). Sixteen-year-olds literally cannot evaluate long-term consequences. Calling that “consent” is scientific fraud.
6/ Data from NCRB 2022: 91,068 POCSO cases filed; over 56 % were for penetrative sexual assault. Most victims below 14, often abused by relatives or teachers, not “teen lovers.” Yet activists cherry-pick a handful of 16-17 cases to dilute protection. That’s policy-making by
7/ Marcuse’s pupil, Simone de Beauvoir, wrote in The Second Sex (1949): “One is not born, but becomes, a woman.” Gramsci called it “cultural hegemony”, capture schools, redefine morality, erode religion. Lowering the age of consent fits the script: politicise childhood, erase
8/ India’s Constitution already mandates the opposite. Articles 15(3) & 39(f) compel the State to protect women and children. POCSO 2012 and PCMA 2006 set 18 as the non-negotiable line. Remove it, and predators win. The report warns: “Reducing the age of consent … would
9/ Ask the obvious: If 16-year-olds can choose sex, why can’t they vote, drink, or sign a contract? Because the same lobby wants them sexually liberated but politically dependent. Because the agenda isn’t empowerment, it’s destabilisation. Lowering this age is not “progressive”.
10/ This is not a debate on romance. It is a battle for civilisation. Sexualising minors under the banner of “rights” isn’t progress, it’s a weapon. Bharat’s law at 18 is the firewall between protection and predation. Lower it, and the line between consent and coercion disappears
Read @abhijitjoag's Termites! He gives with source how sexualization is one of the Marxist agendas to destroy civilization and establish a totalitarian society devoid of morality
@gargiuvacha Very nicely put.... Sums up the issue beautifully đź‘Ť
@gargiuvacha This post succinctly proves that this law being proposed will be disastrous for this civilization which has grown organically for millinea. Tempering with our cultural heritage through brown sepoys is the new war, now.