trying not to engage with "proship" discourse that much anymore but the notion that being against the "queerification" of incest is puritan is probably the best example of people not understanding puritanism if you know anything about purity balls for example.
incest is innately puritanical and a large piece of puritan culture is the platforming of incestuous dynamics like the belief that children are objects that belong to the parents and that boundaries of physical and sexual nature are of most importance to preserve the [...]
purity of the family. the co-opting of a violent social infrastructure like incest whether it be emotional incest or take presence in the existence of the nuclear family, or purity balls. incest in and of itself is not something that can be co-opted for queerness without [...]
returning to patriarchal and violent ideals because incest in and of itself is violent and part of patriarchy infrastructure. there's no reason to pretend that rape culture is part of queerness because it gets you off.
being against the co-oping of rape culture into some form of queerness isn't puritan, it's called having actual critical thinking skills. being aroused by child abuse isn't liberationist, you're just an asocial pervert.