Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha so al-Ukbari wants me to ego hunt him no issues bismillah let’s begin I will now do an analysis of Ibn muflih book passage that apparently i missquoted (this scan is mine)
This inference does not necessarily follow. Ibn muflih’s ruling concerns the hukm fiqhi of reciting Quran in salah not the ontological nature of the recited letters. Even if Ibn muflih held that the letters produced by humans are created, he could still maintain that those
Looking into the BOOK he quoted this is referring to the chapter of oaths in fact, this whole page refuted Al ukbari himself because if you read the page it is said لَمْ يَحْنَتْ فِي قَولِ أَكْثَرِ العلماء؛ لأنَّ الكلام في العُرْف لا يُطلَقُ إِلَّا على كلام الآدَمِيِّينَ Ibn
When he says that an oath by the quraan or kalam allah is binding because it is “a sifah from the sifah of His self,” he is affirming that speech (kalam ) is an attribute of allah , not that Allāh speaks with letters and and sounds. And as I said he is doing tawil to feet his
IN THE OWN FOOTNOTES it says وهي رسالة لعبد الله بن الإمام أحمد رحمه الله فى الرد على الجهمية . لما يظهر في سياق الخبر . وحاولت العثور عليها فيما ينسب إليه من المؤلفات فلم أجدها . والله تعالى أعلم Meaning that how can this statement be attributed to Al imam Ahmad Ibn hanbal He
Regardless ibn rajab speaks about this so called book that’s supposedly attributed to al imam Ahmad Ibn hanbal He says: نص عليه أحمد في رواية عبد الله (۲)، ذكره الخلال في أحكام العبيد عن الخضر بن المثنى الكندي عنه، والخضر هذا مجهول، ينفرد (۳) عن عبد الله برواية المناكير التي لا
Now that we’ve exposed this Wahhabi for being a liar. All I have to say is may allah guide him clearly he became my slave in this thread. 🤣
I don’t know who these Wahhabis think they are, I’m literally the hanbali madhab and I will defend imam Ahmad with my life. 😁