That @LarrySummers was talking to Jeffrey Epstein (after he had done his time) is none of anyone's business. A good man and invaluable contributor to our country is now "disgraced"... It's unAmerican. There must be a way to investigate what needs to be investigated without
fascist? How the f*ck do I know what Summers knew or didn't know about what Epstein had been doing and whether he had been "rehabiliated"? But in America, we have the right to our privacy, even to talk to the unrehabilitated, and we don't expect law enforcement or our gove
I’m astonished at how quickly people are willing to watch basic rights get steamrolled.
Because if you watch the exchange, he seems to take issue only with the idea that Jews were "born" that way. He never objects to any of Fuentes's descriptions. He only makes the point, essentially, that Jews can be saved.
I have a bunch. Why? Did he say something to disagree with my point?
Yes, so what? What legal principle are you advocating for here?
You think I'd advocate Megyn Kelly's private emails being released without her permission? I faulted Megyn for publicly defending Candace Owens for using implausible arguments that directly contradicted arguments she had made about other people in the past.
Summers is allowed to have a relationship with a free man. There is no legal procedure that deprioritizes his rights because you or I don't approve of who he chooses as a friend. I'm frankly dumbfounded that people don't understand this point. It seems so basic to me.