Decision in the Sandie Peggie case. She was not directly or indirectly discriminated against, her claim of victimisation fails entirely, her claim of harassment fails largely and her claim against Beth Upton fails entirely.
This is the second decision - both first instance - since the appalling For (Some) Women Scotland decision to find that there is no trans bathroom ban.
Some criticism is made of the way in which Naomi Cunningham conducted herself. Query whether this is going to come before her professional regulator.
This is the key paragraph in the decision.
This is a real disaster for those - pretty much the entirety of the British media - advancing a maximalist reading of the For (Some) Women Scotland decision.
Oooft. Sandie Peggie shared highly offensive messages and was then "untruthful" in giving evidence to the Tribunal. This is the 'hero' Gender Critical campaigners chose.
I can't help but remember that "it" is also the word used by the man who murdered poor Brianna Ghey in a transphobic attack. These people don't have "reasonable concerns" - they are revolting bigots.
