This is the proof to the World of Science and Mathematics that 1x1=2. #mathematics #worldofscience @rollingstone #proof
@terrencehoward @RollingStone What about what they say that any number multiplied by 1 is itself. In this concept 1 x 1 has to equal 1
@EdnaLion1973 @RollingStone That would contradict the law of action and reaction
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Stick to acting bro. You failed miserably in trying to explain your flawed mathematical illogical expression. Nice try though
@terrencehoward @RollingStone This literally says "sky people" gave an ancient civilization a multiplication table. C'mon man...
@terrencehoward @RollingStone If you follow the order of operations at the bottom of your 1st page, the “unbalanced equation” necessitates multiplying (1*1) and then adding 1, which equals 2. On the other side, following order, you have (1+1), which equals 2. No imbalance here, just a misapplication of maths
@terrencehoward @RollingStone You should join crypto, you'd do well with us
@terrencehoward @RollingStone okay since math clearly isn't your strong point let's try it using regular words 1 x 1 literally means "one, one time" there's no multiple here
@terrencehoward @RollingStone This is why you got fired from Iron man 2 😂
@terrencehoward @RollingStone So 1 x 1 x 1 = 3?
@terrencehoward @RollingStone can we get an update?
@terrencehoward @RollingStone You cannot just assign letters to numbers randomly as a base for your calculations 1x1=1 is not axb=c it is axa=a squared
@terrencehoward @DanGurewitch @RollingStone Dan, honestly wtf
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Why anybody would give the time of day to this fool?
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Does 1x3=4?
@terrencehoward @RollingStone @dkthomp this should be in your book
@terrencehoward @RollingStone My god... you are either trolling, entirely detached from reality and need mental help, or are so engrained in a god complex that you've gaslit yourself to actually believe this makes sense. Where would someone even begin in calling out the flaws in logic here...
@terrencehoward @Busko22 @RollingStone @CoruscaKhaya come have fun this is above my IQ🙊
@terrencehoward Your tweet was quoted in an article by hitfix https://uproxx.com/movies/tere...
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Wait what
@terrencehoward @RollingStone I tried to read this seriously, but the elementary typos ruin it for me.
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Please stop. Just stop. Not only is your proof hilariously wrong in so many ways, it's not even written as a proper proof and argument.
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Do you know what the difference between multiplication (×) and addition (+) is?
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Multiplication is cool.. But have you ever tried addition?
@terrencehoward @RollingStone I've got one one dollar bill so now I have two dollars! Nice!
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Multiplication is merely repeated addition. When you think axb say "a, b times." eg 3x2 is 3, 2 times=6. Also, 3x1 is 3, 1 time=3. And yes... 1x1 is 1, 1 time=1. You have a short circuit in your thinking somewhere.
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Your logic would then question every mathematical equation put forth in math, and would upset a cohesive balance of the × and + system!
@terrencehoward @RollingStone That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.
@terrencehoward @__amethy5t @RollingStone This is not how math works (1x1)-1=0 0x1=0 Fluffing terms doesn't make up for lack of basic arithmetic
@terrencehoward @handymayhem @RollingStone Wrong. You just tried to mix various laws that don’t make sense. Starting with the false premise using a x b = c. and giving a different variable for the same number. You couldn’t solve any equations using this flawed logic. 🤚👎🏼
@terrencehoward @RollingStone No, 1 + (1 x 1) does not resolve to: 3 It just doesn't.
@terrencehoward @RollingStone Was your account hacked?